Saturday, January 14, 2017

Hearing extended again on Winchester gun range

By CALLIE GINTER Sentinel Staff

WINCHESTER — Not everyone had a chance to speak at the Winchester zoning board meeting Thursday night, so plans for a shooting range in town will have yet another public hearing in February. Thursday’s hearing wasn’t much different from the second public hearing last month: Opponents of the project voiced their ongoing concerns about safety, property values and sound levels, while Ridgeline Shooting Sports LLC, a Massachusetts-based company, pushed for its plans.
The main differences between the latest meeting and the previous hearings were the presence of three Winchester police officers at the town hall to ensure everyone behaved, and residents had to keep their comments or questions to five minutes per person. The public hearing had a two-hour limit, and by 9:30 p.m., some people still hadn’t had their say. The board voted to continue the hearing.
“I’m trying not to get emotional so I’ll try to stay technical,” said Mark Tigan, a Winchester resident.
“Where’s our lawyer? This is going to the courts. My guess is we would be better off having legal counsel to guide us in this thing. We are in over our head and I’d urge you to have us represented at these (zoning board) meetings as soon as possible so we don’t get tripped up in court,” he told the zoning board.
The meeting inevitably got emotional.
Not even an hour in, Raymond Roberts, a resident who opposes the range, stormed out of the room, frustrated, but returned minutes later. A mother with her child left upset because she didn’t get her chance to speak after sitting for nearly three hours.
Most of those in attendance were angry over Ridgeline’s plans to put a gun range and wilderness survival skills training area on three properties between Hinsdale (Route 119) and Fenton Hill roads despite public opposition. The sites are in the agricultural, commercial and residential zoning districts.
The company is requesting a special exception from the Winchester zoning board so it can use the property zoned as agricultural for the range, and a variance to use the property zoned as residential. The business, which is categorized in town zoning laws as amusement, recreation or sport, is already allowed in the commercial zoning district.
Ridgeline describes the proposed business as a marksmanship park with 10 rifle ranges and 27 shorter-distance bays for small-arms activities. The longest rifle range, according to the project application, is 1,000 yards.
Alex Hartmann, president of Ridgeline Shooting Sports, said he understands people’s concerns about safety and noise, but said, “I’ve double checked and tripled checked … why would I dump so much money into something I couldn’t open?”
Some of those opposing the plan were fired up about the language used in Ridgeline’s application.
Winchester resident Paul Dobbs read a list of what he called “misleading statements made by Ridgeline.”
“That they guarantee total containment of bullets,” he read to the board.
“On such a small piece of land, that’s impossible to guarantee,” Dobbs said.
He read another about noise: “That bullets fly through the air silently.”
“In fact, bullets flying through the air are far from silent, but do cause their own sound totally separate from the noise of the explosion issuing from the muzzle. It’s called the supersonic crack,” Dobbs said.
Julia Ferrari, who lives in the town’s village of Ashuelot, shared similar concerns and said she was worried by the vague language in the application.
Some had more personal concerns.
“Something happened at the last meeting,” said Ashuelot village resident Jennifer Bellan.
“I was sitting behind the gentlemen from Ridgeline ... when other people were talking, there was eye rolling and snickering and giggling,” Bellan said of the company representatives. “We’re talking about what are we bringing into our town. I’m sure these gentlemen didn’t mean to come off as sounding like 13-year-old girls but it just did not feel good ... I don’t mean to insult you gentlemen, but what I saw that night was distressing.”
Hartmann did not respond to Bellan’s comments.
At the next meeting, Hartmann will be required to provide written answers to various noise control questions from the consultant he has contracted with, Massachusetts-based Noise Control Engineering, LLC.
Cynthia Ryder of Winchester kept her comment short.
“We’ve already stated how we want to use it (the land) — please remember it’s the master plan we want enforced,” Ryder said. The master plan’s purpose is to envision the best and most appropriate future development for the community.
The fourth public hearing on the project will be Thursday, Feb. 2, at 7 p.m. at the town hall. People who were not able to voice their opinions from Thursday night’s meeting will be the first speakers, according to the board
.
Callie Ginter can be reached at 352-1234, extension 1409 or cginter@keenesentinel.com. Follow her on Twitter @CGinterKS.

2 comments:

  1. Unbelievable, we have come to the point in Winchester and the United States where we need 3 police officers to control the crowd at a local information meeting? Maybe these officers just needed a little overtime.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You don't suppose that someone in power in this town needs employment for themselves or friends and family?

    ReplyDelete